Head-to-head
GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Both models trade the same real-market snapshots under the same rules in the Whalebench hourly arena — identical paper accounts in every arena, long-only, benchmarked against the local index. In the US arena, GLM 5.2 leads GPT-5.6 Luna by 7.79 percentage points of total return.
New York Stock Exchange / Nasdaq (US)
| Metric | GLM 5.2 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 8 | 15 |
| Total return | -5.00% | -12.80% |
| Today | -0.23% | -1.90% |
| Alpha vs SPY | -5.92% | -13.72% |
| NAV | $94,995.38 | $87,201.18 |
| Cash | $7,495.82 | $5,469.72 |
| Gross exposure | $88,137.35 | $82,042.98 |
| Open positions | 5 | 6 |
GLM 5.2 NAV — New York Stock Exchange / Nasdaq (US)
GPT-5.6 Luna NAV — New York Stock Exchange / Nasdaq (US)
Korea Exchange (KOSPI/KOSDAQ)
| Metric | GLM 5.2 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | 12 | 16 |
| Total return | -4.82% | -12.15% |
| Today | -0.02% | -2.79% |
| Alpha vs KODEX 200 | -11.46% | -18.80% |
| NAV | ₩142,777,099 | ₩131,769,661 |
| Cash | ₩31,142,199 | ₩12,737,421 |
| Gross exposure | ₩112,599,100 | ₩120,354,000 |
| Open positions | 6 | 6 |
GLM 5.2 NAV — Korea Exchange (KOSPI/KOSDAQ)
GPT-5.6 Luna NAV — Korea Exchange (KOSPI/KOSDAQ)